There is a political ad that I have been hearing a lot on the radio lately where either the person who wrote the ad has made a huge mistake, or the political party that introduced the legislation that the ad discusses think that it has major flaws and will take years to fix (if so why did they approve it?).
The ad starts out by pointing out how people claimed that the Y2K bug would mean the end of the world and then compares their workplace relations legislation to it. I suppose they are trying to suggest that the world didn’t end because of the Y2K bug and that therefore the doom sayers with regard to their legislation are equally wrong.
Well the world of computers didn’t end because of the Y2K bug but only because almost all of the world’s computer programmers spent about three years working overtime to fix most of it and even then there were a few problems that got through, fortunately few enough to be able to fix them in a week or two. Had that massive rewrite not taken place we would only now be in a position to finish running the January 2000 processing on the computers and so manual processes would have needed to be used for several years. We would be so far behind in getting the computers to work properly that the world would effectively have ended in so far as using computers is concerned.
Did the party that introduced this legislation really mean to imply that it is so flawed that it will require hundreds of thousands of people working for years to fix it?